Tagged: pdxengage17 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Bill Densmore 9:11 am on May 24, 2017 Permalink
    Tags: citizens, collaborator, , engagement, experts, facilitator, gatekeeper, legacy, newsroom, pdxengage17   

    Nine people imagine how a 20K-circ. daily might use tools and practices for better engagement 

    How might a 20,000-circulation daily newspaper find tools and adopt practices for better engaging with existing and new audiences?  At Elevate Engagement ,  Journalism That Matters board member (and Reynolds Journalism Institute fellow) Bill Densmore discussed the topic with nine fellow conference-goers over an hour — in groups of three each.  You can listen to the discussion from here (or just click on the carat to the left of the bar below if it is showing).

    Do you have specific ideas for improving the way newsrooms connect with their audiences, listeners, viewers and citizens? What is the best way to move beyond the role of gatekeeper and into a role as facilitator, collaborator and information valet?  Post your comments below!

    BONUS LINK: What do we mean by “engagement”?  |  Another view of engagement (Peggy Holman-2015)
    Overall conference contents/outcomes

    Our commentators (left to right in photos below):


    • Alex Powers, student, Univ. of Oregon School of Journalism & Communication; ex reporter Klamath Falls [Ore.] Herald & News
    • Emily Olson, student, Univ. of Oregon School of Journalism & Communication, intern, Pendleton [Ore.] East Oregonian
    • Christine Whitney-Sanchez, Innovation Parters International, Phoenix, Ariz.



    • Suzette Riley, general manager, C&C Marketing/PR agency in Portland, Ore., and Boston; working on environmental and social issues
    • Tova Averbuch, organizational-development consultant, Holon, Israel
    • Joy Mayer, consultant, strategics and trainer around news-industry engagement, Sarasota, Fla.

    PANEL ONE: From left, Alex Powers, Emily Olson and Christine Whitney-Sanchez

    PANEL THREE: From left, Suzette Riley, Tova Averbuch and Joy Mayer

    PANEL TWO: From left, Burgess Brown, Ashley Alvarado and Todd Milbourn

  • Yu Vongkiatkajorn 3:51 pm on May 23, 2017 Permalink
    Tags: labor, pay, pdxengage17, wages   

    Is passion enough? Dealing with the financial realities of student debt and unwaged labor in journalism. 

    Session Host: Yu Vongkiatkajorn and Simon Nyi

    Reporter: Jesse Hardman & Yu Vongkiatkajorn

    Keegan Clements-Housser
    Jesse Hardman
    Simon Galperin
    Mark Rellman
    Lisa Heyamoto
    Gracie McKenzie

    The purpose of the session was to open up a space for people to discuss what’s usually a taboo topic in journalism: fair wages and how little journalism pays. Participants shared what brought them to the session and questions they were dealing with.

    Simon N. Worked in a college newsroom. Avoided working as a reporter on the hill because knew I had student debt. Risk adverse. Was never an option to just ‘do what I love.’ Doesn’t work in traditional journalism now, but has economic security. Such a taboo to talk about fact that journalism doesn’t pay. Spaces need to be created to talk about this.

    Simon G. -has lots of college/grad school debt. Wondering: what can we do moving forward actionable moments in changing paradigm of what journalism pays? Tough to get experience (internships) to get to a job when internships don’t pay very well. Have always wanted to start an intern rights org.

    Mark- graduating from U of Oregon and going into corporate PR, not journalism. Important to take burden of college debt off students. “I want a livelihood and career that can grow.”

    Lisa- Teaches at UO J-school. As a journalism teacher I’m dealing with j school students every day who see this problem on the horizon. It’s tough, because students feel that they are signing up for a really difficult financial future.
    Other aspect, as a mid-career person, I think about my own path. I’ve got two kids, partner in media. Many years trying to balance passion/finance. Academia has provided a living wage. Making enough to not worry really helps.

    The journalism model has been disrupted, and there are all these opportunities, but they don’t pay well, if at all.

    Gracie- Citylab DC. Does social media for the site. Senior project in college was history, politics and intersection. Feels like she can’t speak out about fair wages without potentially feeling repercussions in her work.

    Simon- We need to talk about this issue, but it puts burden on people who are willing to actually put this topic out there and might be affected.

    Lisa – Prestige can get in the way of actually coming up with a plan that works.

    Simon – If you start conversation around Unionizing a media outlet, you can get labeled a troublemaker.

    Keegan – Notes that he is getting paid more from an international media outlet than in the US. We have to challenge the concept that there is not money in media. Call them out on that.

    Other Simon – working in community media you hear mainstream journalists say, we don’t have time to go cover something.
    Gannett has money, it’s just not going to the product, and reporters.

    Yu- When Mother Jones fellows recently asked for (and successfully) received minimum wage, they argued that their work was crucial to the magazine.

    Some overall takeaways and common themes:

    • People recognize that journalism pays little and have *consciously* chosen to not pursue careers in journalism as a result.
    • There needs to be more transparency about pay and spaces to talk about pay.
    • We shouldn’t be demonizing PR.. and it’s okay to look for other sources of pay.
    • Unions and labor movements are often portrayed by the media as agitators—is there a way to change how they are covered so that it’s not so antagonistic?
    • Our conversation just scratched the surface, and we need to keep it going!
compose new post
next post/next comment
previous post/previous comment
show/hide comments
go to top
go to login
show/hide help
shift + esc