Updates from Dan Moulthrop Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Dan Moulthrop 11:27 am on April 9, 2013 Permalink
    Tags: 100 ways to generate revenue   

    100 ways to generate revenue 

    100 ways to generate revenue:

    This session was merged with Josh Wolf’s session about the very clever idea of getting a community based retail operation (brew-pub, for instance, or coffee roaster) that could subsidize the journalism. We never got to fully play with this idea.

    We began by polling people present to see where revenue comes from in the organizations they work with.

    Callie Carswell of High Country News: 10 percent advertising, 30 percent subscriptions, 1/3 grants, 1/3 individual donors

    Russ Baker of Whowhatwhy.org–100 percent individual donors.

    Anthony Shawcross, Open media fdn– 60-70 percent, earned income–communications services, subsidizes citizen journalism. 30 percent grants and donated moneys.

    Colorado Public News–funded by indiviudal donors and grants…even with the huge influx of money

    Michelle Ferrier of Locally Grown News: For profit–consulting, using intellectual capital in work with farmers markets

    Kelly McBride of Poynter: Tampa Bay times is owned by Poynter– previously funded us. But it’s no longer profitable… now, the goal is to just not lose money. Poynter gets additional revenue from advertising, consulting, educations, private donations.

    Josh Wolf suggested freely distributed print publications subsidized entirely by ads…

    Dan Petty of the Denver Post: Subscription, ads, and now, strategic marketing consulting, including social media, google adwords, facebook ads campaign…
    Digital advertising pays for the newsroom–200 people–more than $10 million. Some of the ads go into a national ad network….Dallas Morning News has ads trafficked through Denver…

    Rita Andolsen said WKYC is also providing add’l services for advertising clients…

    The question arose: Could there be a for-profit arm that would subsidize the news…To which someone offered the rejoinder: Can you have for-profit news that doesn’t get corrupted? That got the group focused on the possibility of lobbying for increased government subsidy of the media, which met with two primary objections: editors of for-profit orgs largely don’t want to be beholden to the government, and the political climate is unlikely to prove to be receptive to such a proposal. We agreed to let it go.

    A few other models were mentioned:
    MedCity News, which focuses on a niche industry and builds community and events around that.
    Issue Media Group (FreshWater, PopCity, Model D, and others), which builds coalitions in communities to support coverage of arts, innovation, economic development and emerging trends (not hard news.
    Texas Tribune, which has revenue from members, major donors, philanthropy, corporate sponsorships, newsletter subscriptions, earned revenue (NYT partnership), and events (>$900K in 2012).

    Philanthropic model–ProPub,

    Yes Magazine–ongoing support, distributed support, 1700 members, giving monthly. … sales, subscriptions, swag, book, book publishing.

     
  • Dan Moulthrop 7:45 am on April 8, 2013 Permalink
    Tags: "civic journalism", Engagement   

    What is engagement? 

    There were 17 people present, most of whom are referenced somewhere in the notes below.

    We began with a quick round of introductions, in which each member of the group characterized their perspective on engagement–what follows here are some of the highlights…
    Josh S said he comes from a perspective of being interested community organizing and what it can do for for journalis?
    Kelly–pointed out that in our vernacular, Engagement is a promise to be in a relationship with another person…
    Laura asked, what does the community mean by it? what do they want to do?
    Mike Fancher said Innovation in J has been around the old (business) model, and he’s interested in seeing it center around a new model.
    Rita said that E Varies from person to person and there is a range of engagement, from watching the news to acting in the world
    Dan Petty said, “it’s a question I ask myself every day,” and he worried the word has lost its meaning…
    Christof spoke of his interest in the link b/w environmentalism and engagement…
    And Ted said he prefers the word “involvement.”

    We then began to pursue three essential questions, only two of which we managed to answer.
    Question: How do we engage?
    Q: Why do we engage? Why should we engage?
    Q: How do we measure it?

    Ted began by coming back to Kelly’s notion, that there is a commitment involved–we will do this together. It levels the playing field b/w Js and public
    Marla–involvement is the most useful for me. At the NCDD, she said, E centers on dialogue, and there are four categories:
    -Explore a topic,
    -Deal with conflict,
    -Decision making (rather than the “decide and defend” model), and
    -Collaborative action.

    Jill pulled the conversation back to the beginning, asking, “Do we share this assumption that we are already engaged by writing a story?” Which ended up with consensus that yes, we do share that assumption, but there are multiple entry points to engagement and it is a driver of ongoing relationships with communities.

    So WHY engage?
    Before diving into the why question, Kelly M. noted how important transparency is: E makes audience more valuable to advertisers. Sometimes it builds our relationships, and where I hope we get to is that that’s how we build community, so we have to be really transparent when we ask ppl to engage with us.

    Marla reminded the group of the role civic J has always played in strengthening democracy, and political J has been disconnected from that…In her former role at Texcas pubcaster, they would connect citizen concerns, talk to them, hold forums, recorded them, put them on the air–hold accountable candidates to answer citizen questions–engagement bloomed as a democratic exercise…. Various experiments

    Mike F. Why do ppl engage with J or school district–giving them the information isn’t the mission any more–participating with them is the mission.
    Marla–ppl engage bc they want to tell their story, they want to figure things out; they want to share stories–they’ve lost trust in gov’t…
    Margie T. Feminist, collaborative style of doing journalism–
    Jill–Question of authority…Big J was rarified…it’s so much more reachable and tangible…Media literacy is so important in this…
    David… let’s not lose sight of the ppl who get engaged bc they suddenly have an interest in govt…multiply that interest…
    Dan–Is the desire to engage the same desire that drives our work as journalists?

    Josh S: TRUST. bring communities in before during and after publication of story– that’s a way to build trust…
    Kelly–trust gets built in a new way in this new ecosystem… relationships instead of authority…
    Ted–is the flip side–we are more convinced of our own opinions…
    Marla–Harwood–trus
    Josh–trust in personal networks

    So, then, Why engage? To build community and build trust in the community.

    Christoff helped us turn our attention to the What is engagement? question, and its cousin, How are we engaging people?

    Peggy noted that at Lawrence Journal World, under Jane Ellen Stevens, they created a site that wasthe go-to place for health information in Lawrence–started with the community. Half the content would come from Journalists, and half would come from the community. WellCommons.com. Rather than built around topics, they built around group. Businesses pay to participate, individuals get free access. Changed the way reporters approached their work bc the stories they pursue are informed by sharing space. (this could be a great model for ideastream)

    Ted asked, is this a New form of beat reporting?
    One of the Mike’s noted it’s definitely a new relationship with authority…

    Josh wondered about these models and whose responsibility is it to engage? When is it our responsibility to go out and engage the ppl who aren’t engaged?

    Laura–it’s not hard to imagine ways that aren’t similar to recent forms…But What’s the continuing engagement?

    Ted–engagement in shaping and creating– and engagement that moves beyond…

    Laura–there might even be three–what does it become?

    Marla–community of churches paired up–exchanged congregants–talked about race–kept the conversation going…

    Dan– Editorial boards becoming engagement boards….

    Christoff–but what do we mean by “the community?”

    Kelly–communities, not Community.

    Peggy– it needn’t be neat and tidy…what if the meeting just happened the first monday of every month, and if you want to be a part of it, you show up…story from Tacoma washington, Af-Am community…

    Margie–its our responsibility to be intentional about recruiting diversity

    Kelly–you’re never there. Every community is fluid.

    Josh–2 resources–CW anderson talks about publics, Rebuilding the News… a piece on Nieman Lab. Missed opportunities

    David G. Resources for reaching out–Nonprofits have a great eagerness to help w outreach.

    Jill–from the meta perspective–this has an opportunity to

    Mike–community engagement should be a part of the community,,,

    How do you measure it? CIRCLE at Tufts. RJI, Joy Mayer has resources.

    A couple of important links:
    Josh Stearns mentioned this piece about what endorsements should do:
    http://stearns.wordpress.com/2012/10/31/the-missed-opportunity-of-newspaper-endorsements/#more-1125

    Dan Moulthrop wrote this piece reflecting on the session:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-moulthrop/engagement-can-save-journ_b_3022257.html

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel