{"id":79,"date":"2015-10-14T04:16:18","date_gmt":"2015-10-14T04:16:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journalismthatmatters.org\/experienceengagementsessionnotes\/measuring-polarization-and-consensus-within-community-engagement\/"},"modified":"2015-10-14T04:16:18","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T04:16:18","slug":"measuring-polarization-and-consensus-within-community-engagement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journalismthatmatters.org\/experienceengagementsessionnotes\/2015\/10\/14\/measuring-polarization-and-consensus-within-community-engagement\/","title":{"rendered":"Measuring “Polarization and Consensus” Within Community Engagement"},"content":{"rendered":"

Host: John Spady, Seattle, Founder of the National Dialogue Network (http:\/\/ncdd.org\/10940), Twitter: @JSpady; Facebook: \/JSpady<\/p>\n

Participants: Amber Rivera, Bruce Poinsette, Miro Merrill, Rachel Damgen, Kathryn Langstaff<\/p>\n

Notes (limited):
\n1) Capturing routine feedback of participant values and opinions during broad scale community engagement provides unexpected and significant insights into what participants have in common and which demographic\/psychographic groups of participant were more or less likely to engage and participate.<\/p>\n

2) Feedback from participants after face-to-face and online engagement, and its unbiased analysis afterwards, improves understanding of the effectiveness of engagement, and engagement strategies, within diverse communities.<\/p>\n

Infographic describing proprietary PC-Rating\u2122: http:\/\/bit.ly\/PCRating
\nKeywords: consensus, engagement, metrics, measures, surveys, opinions, values<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Host: John Spady, Seattle, Founder of the National Dialogue Network (http:\/\/ncdd.org\/10940), Twitter: @JSpady; Facebook: \/JSpady Participants: Amber Rivera, Bruce Poinsette, Miro Merrill, Rachel Damgen, Kathryn Langstaff Notes (limited): 1) Capturing routine feedback of participant values and opinions during broad scale … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1030,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[9,14,22,24,27,32,35],"class_list":["post-79","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-post","tag-consensus","tag-engagement","tag-measures","tag-metrics","tag-opinions","tag-surveys","tag-values"],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journalismthatmatters.org\/experienceengagementsessionnotes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journalismthatmatters.org\/experienceengagementsessionnotes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journalismthatmatters.org\/experienceengagementsessionnotes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journalismthatmatters.org\/experienceengagementsessionnotes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1030"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journalismthatmatters.org\/experienceengagementsessionnotes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=79"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/journalismthatmatters.org\/experienceengagementsessionnotes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journalismthatmatters.org\/experienceengagementsessionnotes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=79"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journalismthatmatters.org\/experienceengagementsessionnotes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=79"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journalismthatmatters.org\/experienceengagementsessionnotes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=79"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}