-
Thu, 06/03/2010 - 12:15pm - Sun, 06/06/2010 - 12:15pm
-
Thu, 07/22/2010 (All day) - Sun, 07/25/2010 (All day)
An Open Letter to Journalists

It’s time for a new compact between Journalists and the Public.
We need you. Your work is vital to the well-being of us all. I can’t imagine a functional democracy without the passionate commitment journalists make to digging deeply into what matters. It is a sacred trust and I thank you for doing it on our behalf.
If I – and others –believe that, why do so many of us seem hostile to the press? Because we feel betrayed. Where were you when we needed you? Where were your warnings about the state of the economy? About the lies of weapons of mass destruction? About the many stories closer to home that affect our lives and well-being? Did you miss the clues yourself? Did you know and not help us hear your messages? How could you let us down?
If you don’t feel trusted, please understand that it is in part the corporation behind you that many of us don’t trust. When my primary identity shifted from citizen to consumer something died. You are not your corporation. I don’t need them. I need you.
If you’re frustrated or angry about the state of the media, you are not alone. We are all frustrated. It’s time to take that energy and refocus it together.
I want your partnership to navigate these confusing times. You don’t need to guide me or be my gatekeeper. The fence is gone. I have the means to speak for myself. And if that makes you fear for your relevance, your ability to bridge the technical divide or the enduring values of journalism, know that we can help each other. I want you by my side – your skills, values, and all – as we, together, travel through this challenging time. Let us re-negotiate our commitments to each other.
You ask, Who will pay for journalism if not corporations?
I will. And others like me. Create a new compact with us and we’ll find a way because journalism matters.
My expectations and requests:
- Treat me as a citizen first. As a consumer I don’t need you. As a citizen, I do.
- Listen and engage with me in identifying and pursuing the stories that make a difference.
- Share with me your intention in telling a story, why you believe it matters for me to know. Stay with it even if I am slow to engage.
- Provide context so that I understand the nuance of a story. Use the new technologies so that I get a “macroscopic” view of the situation, in which I can see how it all fits together and how I fit with it.
- Tell me stories through an appreciative eye, helping me to see not just the worst of the situation but the possibilities inherent in whatever is happening.
- Help me understand what to look for to know a source is trustworthy or a story is well told so that I learn how to value quality journalism.
- Help me transition to new technologies even as you are doing so yourself.
- Help me tell my story well, to get the facts straight, to be transparent about my motives, to make my intention clear.
- Bring us together as a community – engage us in conversations, helping us to hear one another’s perspectives – even those that are different, hostile, uncomfortable – to uncover what matters to us all.
- I know that as a system dies, a new one rises from its ashes. Just as you tell me the stories of systems failing, tell me also of the renaissance that is even now gaining momentum. Look for the trends, the hints that something new is taking root and help it to grow by shining a light on it.
What you can count on from me:
- I’ll tell you what I need, make you aware of the stories that matter to me.
- I’ll offer you my stories, my questions, as well as my information, knowledge, expertise and creativity to support stories you are doing.
- I’ll listen to your counsel because I know you are looking at a situation on my behalf and may have more information or see something happening before the rest of us.
- Between what I want and what you believe I need to hear, together, we’ll get clearer about what is newsworthy, what stories need to be told.
- When you speak to me of possibilities, I will engage, bringing my voice and energy to the issues that you raise.
It is time for a co-creative partnership between us because journalism is too important to leave just to professionals.
If we work together, the means to pay for journalism will emerge. I know it won’t be easy or comfortable or nearly as fast as we need it. This time the sacred trust goes both ways.
Peggy Holman
One of many formerly known as the audience
Peggy Holman is co-author of The Change Handbook. She has been working with journalists for nine years through an initiative called Journalism that Matters – www.journalismthatmatters.org. It is a floating conversation among the diverse people in the new news ecology about our emerging media landscape.
- PeggyHolman's blog
- Login or register to post comments
-







Comments
I completely agree with
I completely agree with everything you have said, but my main concern is getting this message out to the younger generation. They will have to work hard to define the future of journalism and public awareness. As a teenager, according to our society's perception of the younger generation, I am supposed to be worrying about which new show just came out on MTV or which fashion and lifestyle trends are worth following. In fact, as a teenager, I am supposed to be doing just about anything but worrying about the direction out nation is headed. But with the problems with the United States economy inching ever closer to home and the controversial proposed healthcare reforms raising eyebrows all over the nation, I can no longer sit back as decisions are made with little input from young adults. As I brainstormed ways to get my message out, it dawned on me; my voice is not the only voice that is dying to be heard. My concern is shared by many. Many who are also concerned about the rising cost of everything including the education we all desperately need. Which is why I started Academia Plus (A+). I want to get as many voices out there as I can. I want the voices of the youth of our nation to be so strong, so feverous that no elected representative can set aside common interests to uphold a personal agenda. Instead of taking a spectators part in the chaos that is policy, I have chosen to get active and I hope that others will make the same choice.
www.academiaplus.ning.com
Another mean of connection ...
Good post, Peggy. This can give journalists both a boost and a carrot.
To complement Linda's info about the national Public Insight Network, another means of connection among journalists, the public and officials is the local issues forum hosted by e-democracy.org.
More:
http://forums.e-democracy.org/
Letter to journalists
Peggy:
Thank you very much for your heartfelt essay.
As a journalism educator, and as a still-active journalist, I hear you.
I, too, fear for the future of democracy. Of course modern striving-to-be-"objective" and professional journalism is a 20th Century phenomenon. The American republic survived more than a century before that with a press consisting largely of opinion and screed. If we go back there, we will survive again. It may be a cycle.
I am finding there is a big market for journalism students, particularly in my area, photojournalism. We provide a good skill set with words and pictures, especially now that we include web pages and video in the curriculum.
But my students are getting getting jobs as communications professionals for government agencies and companies and non-profits. They are webmasters, they are public relations people. The are freelancers and independent entrepreneurs.
Journalism outlets aren't hiring.
I hear you and I share your frustration.
Over the past year, I have heard from many new entrepreneurs who say they want to save journalism. I have heard from several community web builders and the like who say they have the new model. This new model always has one flaw: it doesn't pay journalists. It assumes people such as yourself will rise up and do the work for free or almost free.
I am unsure whether you agree with this model or not. I disagree strongly.
Journalism is a profession. It is made up of people such as myself. We have families and communities we love. All we ask is a living wage to continue our profession and to support our families.
If you show me a model of how we can build a new model with the tenets you discuss, and at the same time support the people of which the journalism profession represents, I will bend over backwards and sideways to make it happen.
But if we don't support the people with bills to pay as well as the "profession," no new model will get off the ground.
Jack Zibluk
Arkansas State University
jzibluk [at] astate [dot] edu
Yes, I believe we need professional journalists.
Jack,
Professional journalists deserve to make a living wage. I absolutely believe that. Unfortunately, I don’t think the business model will come first. It will be the outcome of a wide range of experiments, some already underway. And it will take a while to emerge.
We are in an era in which the old forms are dying and new forms are being born. As it became clear at the Journalism that Matters-Poynter gathering, the “new news ecology” is entrepreneurial; and it still serves the public good. There is tremendous opportunity in this but like any start-up, most folks are going to be eating beans for a while.
For those willing to follow an idea that matters to them, this is a great time. At the JTM-Poynter gathering, many legacy media people arrived depressed and fearful of the state of the industry. Because we always attract a diverse mix of people, the people from mainstream media began to get a glimpse of the emerging news ecology from people who are in the midst of inventing it. The more they engaged, the more they could see there is room for their skills, talents, and values. One editor who took a buyout a year ago and had been working in PR found a young partner for a new journalism venture. He had arrived wondering if there was a still a place for him in journalism. He left jazzed, having found a way to give a new venture a go.
Take a look and you’ll find tremendous experimentation. You are likely familiar with the Knight News Challenge Grants and J-Lab as sources of funding for such experiments. We’ve had quite a few grow out of our Journalism that Matters gatherings, for example, the Common Language Project, the Information Valet Project at the Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute and www.Spot.us. Ultimately, some of these will scale. Or provide the seeds for something that does.
We are in the midst of a painful hospicing of an old business model of journalism and an exciting midwiving of new models. I personally believe the route to a viable business model is by re-engaging with the essential purpose of journalism – to provide people with information they need to be free and self-governing (to quote Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel). Because of today’s technology, I think we can actually take this purpose further to journalism that not only informs, but engages, inspires, and activates people to play their roles as free and self-governing citizens.
I know that this response does nothing to meet the immediate needs of putting food on the table for many working journalists. And I have no doubt that we will all feel the pain of this. In the meantime, the Huffington Post is launching an investigative fund.
So for now, it is time to help what is dying do so with dignity and to help the new news ecology be born.
_______________________
Peggy Holman
The Change Handbook www.bkconnection.com/changehandbook
www.opencirclecomany.com
Great Article
Great article Peggy, and I agree completely. A new pact needs to be created between the public and the journalist, otherwise tey both will lose.
New partnership
Nice invitation, Peggy. Now let me return the favor and encourage you and everyone for whom your message resonates to join the national Public Insight Network, a growing collective of citizen sources who use their personal insights, knowledge and expertise to inform and enrich news coverage through a variety of media.
Of course, you and other JTMers know all about the Network, but for those who don't, it's a five-year initiative managed by Minnesota Public Radio and American Public Media designed to create a new journalism of partnership between not only the public and the media, but among media themselves. Public radio stations, public television, online publications, newspapers and journalism schools are working together to build and tap this Network, engage citizens and journalists, and as you so eloquently put it, "bring us together as a community – engage us in conversations, helping us to hear one another’s perspectives, even those that are different, hostile, uncomfortable – to uncover what matters to us all."
To learn more or sign up for the Network, go to http://tinyurl.com/c6lsbr
And Peggy, let's talk soon. I have some exciting new projects to tell you about, and I'd love to know what you're up to.
-Linda Fantin, director
Public Insight Journalism
Public Insight Journalism is an exciting development
Hi Linda,
I think what you are doing with PIJ is terrific! It provides the means for people to engage in a variety of meaningful ways. And I love some of the creative approaches your organization is developing to communicate complex ideas. Games like Consumer Consequences help people see themselves in context.
So, I'll send you an email and we'll connect.
Peggy Holman
Journalism that Matters
_______________________
Peggy Holman
The Change Handbook www.bkconnection.com/changehandbook
www.opencirclecomany.com